Peugeot 5008 2017 vs BMW X3 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
BMW X3 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 5008 engine produces 70 HP less power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 100 NM less than BMW X3. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 5008 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 5.2 | |
|
The Peugeot 5008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 5008 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that by driving the Peugeot 5008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1230 km in combined cycle | 1280 km in combined cycle | |
| 1320 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 236 mm (9.3 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Peugeot 5008 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Peugeot 5008 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C4, Peugeot 3008, Citroen Berlingo, Opel Grandland | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW 2 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 5008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X3 2014 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great resource. Overall, the chains are more reliable than in BMW N-series engines, but also tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine requires good quality fuel, maintenance and ... More about BMW X3 2014 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.66 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 5008 is 2 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 5008 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 780 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 780 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1940 litres | 1600 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 5008 (by 340 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 5008 is 0.7 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means Peugeot 5008 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`200 | 2`365 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 20 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 5008 has
|
BMW X3 has
| |