Peugeot 5008 2013 vs Mazda 5 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
Petrol engines (Peugeot 5008) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mazda 5) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 156 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 270 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
Peugeot 5008 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 5008 engine produces 41 HP more power than Mazda 5, but torque is 30 NM less than Mazda 5. Thanks to more power Peugeot 5008 reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 5.2 | |
The Mazda 5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 5008 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 5008 could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
1090 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
Mazda 5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 16 years | 11 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso, Peugeot 3008 | Used also on Mazda 3 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 5008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.53 m | 4.59 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.64 m | 1.62 m | |
Peugeot 5008 is 6 cm shorter than the Mazda 5, 9 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 5008 is 2 cm higher. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 194 litres | 112 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 194 litres | 112 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 679 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1754 litres | 1485 litres | |
In 7-seat version Peugeot 5008 has more luggage space (by 82 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 5008 (by 269 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Peugeot 5008 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mazda 5, which means Peugeot 5008 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`225 | 2`125 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | average | |
Mazda 5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 5008 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 5, so Mazda 5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 8200 | 5200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 5008 has
|
Mazda 5 has
| |