Peugeot 5008 2009 vs Kia Ceed 2009
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 126 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 5008 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 5008 engine produces 30 HP more power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 83 NM more than Kia Ceed. Thanks to more power Peugeot 5008 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.0 | |
|
The Kia Ceed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 5008 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 5008 could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso, Peugeot 3008 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Ceed might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 5008 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Kia Ceed 2009 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Peugeot 5008 is larger. Peugeot 5008 is 4 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 5 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 5008 is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 679 litres | 534 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 679 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 534 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1754 litres | 1664 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 5008 (by 90 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 5008 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Kia Ceed, which means Peugeot 5008 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`225 | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Kia Ceed has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 5008, so Kia Ceed quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 5008 has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |