Peugeot 408 2018 vs Chevrolet Malibu 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
| Peugeot 408 engine produces 24 HP less power than Chevrolet Malibu, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Chevrolet Malibu. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 7.6 | |
|
The Peugeot 408 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 408 consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Malibu, which means that by driving the Peugeot 408 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 49 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| Peugeot 408 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Peugeot 408 is smaller, but slightly higher. Peugeot 408 is 17 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Malibu, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 408 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 447 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Peugeot 408 has 8 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Malibu. The Chevrolet Malibu may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 30 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 408 has
|
Chevrolet Malibu has
| |