Peugeot 408 2012 vs Peugeot 301 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 301 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 408 engine produces 5 HP less power than Peugeot 301, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Peugeot 301. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 408 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 6.5 | |
|
The Peugeot 301 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 408 consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 301, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 408 could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 301 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Peugeot 408 is larger. Peugeot 408 is 26 cm longer than the Peugeot 301, 5 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 408 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 506 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1332 litres | |
|
Peugeot 301 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Peugeot 408 has 51 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 301. This could mean that the Peugeot 408 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`524 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Peugeot 301 has
| |