Peugeot 408 2012 vs Audi A3 2008
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 408 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 408 engine produces 48 HP more power than Audi A3, whereas torque is 92 NM more than Audi A3. Thanks to more power Peugeot 408 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 6.7 | |
|
The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 408 consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 408 could require 480 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 530 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| Audi A3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 124 mm (4.9 inches) | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Peugeot 408 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Peugeot 408 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi A3 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Peugeot 308 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Touran | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi A3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Audi A3 2008 1.6 engine: This engine is simple and reliable, rarely causing significant issues for owners.
Fluctuating idle speed is often linked to a clogged fuel pump strainer or air leaks in the intake system. If vibrations or ... More about Audi A3 2008 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Peugeot 408 is larger. Peugeot 408 is 41 cm longer than the Audi A3, 4 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 408 is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1104 litres | |
|
Peugeot 408 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 408 has 85 litres more trunk space than the Audi A3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 408 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Audi A3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 408 has
|
Audi A3 has
| |