Peugeot 408 2017 vs Peugeot 408 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 - 150 HP | 110 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 - 254 NM | 110 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 - 12.5 seconds | 9.6 - 13.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 7.1 | 4.9 - 9.9 | |
|
Peugeot 408 2017 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 408 2012. On average, Peugeot 408 2017 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 408 2012. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.51 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 408 2017 and Peugeot 408 2012 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 455 litres | |
|
Peugeot 408 2017 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 408 2017 has 105 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 408 2012. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 408 2017 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Peugeot 408 2012. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`810 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 408 has
|
| |