Peugeot 408 2012 vs Peugeot 408 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.8 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 - 150 HP | 114 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 270 NM | 150 - 254 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 13.8 seconds | 8.1 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 9.9 | 4.9 - 7.1 | |
|
Peugeot 408 2012 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 408 2017. On average, Peugeot 408 2012 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 408 2017. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.51 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 408 2012 and Peugeot 408 2017 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 560 litres | |
|
Peugeot 408 2017 has more luggage space. Peugeot 408 2012 has 105 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 408 2017. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 408 2012 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Peugeot 408 2017. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`810 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 26 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Peugeot 408 has
| |