Peugeot 408 2012 vs Peugeot 301 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.8 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 - 150 HP | 72 - 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 270 NM | 110 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 13.8 seconds | 9.4 - 14.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 9.9 | 4.3 - 7.3 | |
|
Peugeot 408 petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 301. On average, Peugeot 408 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 301. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Peugeot 408 is larger. Peugeot 408 is 28 cm longer than the Peugeot 301, 5 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 408 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 506 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1332 litres | |
|
Peugeot 301 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Peugeot 408 has 51 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 301. This could mean that the Peugeot 408 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Peugeot 301 has
| |