Peugeot 406 2003 vs Volvo XC70 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 210 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 285 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC70 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 406 and Volvo XC70 have the same engine power, but Peugeot 406 torque is 35 NM less than Volvo XC70. Peugeot 406 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 11.3 | |
|
The Peugeot 406 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 406 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70, which means that by driving the Peugeot 406 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 406 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC70 2000: Automatic four-wheel drive with torque transfer to rear axle via viscous clutch when front wheels slip. Electronic traction control on front wheels (TRACS), which operates at speeds up to 40 km/h (25 mph) | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.56 m | |
| Peugeot 406 is 1 cm longer than the Volvo XC70, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 406 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 526 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1740 litres | 1641 litres | |
|
Peugeot 406 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 406 has 41 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC70. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 406 (by 99 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 406 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC70. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`155 | 2`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 406 has
|
Volvo XC70 has
| |