Peugeot 406 2002 vs Volvo XC70 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 217 NM | 285 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC70 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 406 engine produces 40 HP less power than Volvo XC70, whereas torque is 68 NM less than Volvo XC70. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 406 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 10.5 | |
|
The Peugeot 406 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 406 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70, which means that by driving the Peugeot 406 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 406 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC70 2000: Automatic four-wheel drive with torque transfer to rear axle via viscous clutch when front wheels slip. Electronic traction control on front wheels (TRACS), which operates at speeds up to 40 km/h (25 mph) | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.56 m | |
| Peugeot 406 is 1 cm longer than the Volvo XC70, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 406 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1440 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1740 litres | 1641 litres | |
|
Peugeot 406 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 406 has 955 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC70. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 406 (by 99 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 406 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC70. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 2`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 406 has
|
Volvo XC70 has
| |