Peugeot 406 2002 vs Rover 75 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 138 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 406 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 406 engine produces 18 HP more power than Rover 75, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Rover 75. Thanks to more power Peugeot 406 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 9.4 | |
|
The Peugeot 406 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 406 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75, which means that by driving the Peugeot 406 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 406 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Peugeot 406 is smaller, but higher. Peugeot 406 is 5 cm shorter than the Rover 75, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 406 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1740 litres | 1222 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 406 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Rover 75. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 406 has
|
| |