Peugeot 406 2002 vs Volvo XC70 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC70 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 406 engine produces 53 HP less power than Volvo XC70, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Volvo XC70. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 406 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 7.6 | |
|
The Peugeot 406 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 406 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70, which means that by driving the Peugeot 406 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 1520 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 406 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC70 2000: Automatic four-wheel drive with torque transfer to rear axle via viscous clutch when front wheels slip. Electronic traction control on front wheels (TRACS), which operates at speeds up to 40 km/h (25 mph) | |||
| Volvo XC70 2004 2.4 engine: These diesel engines are frequently affected by intake manifold swirl flap seizures. This issue often leads to airflow disruptions and rough engine operation.
The actuator for the turbocharger, which relies ... More about Volvo XC70 2004 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.56 m | |
| Peugeot 406 is 1 cm longer than the Volvo XC70, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 406 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 526 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1741 litres | 1641 litres | |
|
Peugeot 406 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 406 has 41 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC70. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 406 (by 100 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 406 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC70. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`075 | 2`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 406 has
|
Volvo XC70 has
| |