Peugeot 406 2002 vs Rover 75 2004
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 116 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 260 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
Peugeot 406 engine produces 6 HP less power than Rover 75, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Rover 75. Despite less power, Peugeot 406 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.9 | |
Peugeot 406 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75, which means that by driving the Peugeot 406 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
1340 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
Peugeot 406 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.74 m | 4.79 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.39 m | |
Peugeot 406 is smaller, but higher. Peugeot 406 is 5 cm shorter than the Rover 75, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 406 is 7 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 526 litres | 400 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1741 litres | 1222 litres | |
Peugeot 406 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Peugeot 406 has 126 litres more trunk space than the Rover 75. The Rover 75 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 406 (by 519 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Peugeot 406 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Rover 75. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`075 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 406 has
|
Rover 75 has
| |