Peugeot 406 2002 vs Rover 75 2004

 
Peugeot 406
2002 - 2004
Rover 75
2004 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 90 HP116 HP
Torque: 205 NM260 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.4 seconds12.3 seconds
Rover 75 is a more dynamic driving.
Peugeot 406 engine produces 26 HP less power than Rover 75, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Rover 75. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 406 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.95.8
Peugeot 406 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 406 could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1180 km in combined cycle1120 km in combined cycle
1450 km on highway1380 km on highway
Peugeot 406 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.74 m4.79 m
Width: 1.76 m1.78 m
Height: 1.46 m1.39 m
Peugeot 406 is smaller, but higher.
Peugeot 406 is 5 cm shorter than the Rover 75, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 406 is 7 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 526 litres400 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1740 litres1222 litres
Peugeot 406 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Peugeot 406 has 126 litres more trunk space than the Rover 75. The Rover 75 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 406 (by 518 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.5 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Peugeot 406 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Rover 75.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0752`090
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data1600
Pros and Cons: Peugeot 406 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Rover 75 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv