Peugeot 406 2002 vs Volkswagen Passat 2000

	Peugeot 406 2002 - 2004	Volkswagen Passat 2000 - 2005
Gearbox:	Manual	Manual
Engine:	2.0 Diesel	1.9 Diesel
Performance
Power:	90 HP	130 HP
Torque:	205 NM	310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	13.4 seconds	10 seconds
	Volkswagen Passat is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 406 engine produces 40 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat, whereas torque is 105 NM less than Volkswagen Passat. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 406 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	5.9	5.9
Fuel tank capacity:	70 litres	62 litres
Full fuel tank distance:	1180 km in combined cycle	1050 km in combined cycle
	1450 km on highway	1260 km on highway
	Peugeot 406 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions
Length:	4.74 m	4.68 m
Width:	1.76 m	1.75 m
Height:	1.46 m	1.50 m
	Peugeot 406 is larger, but slightly lower. Peugeot 406 is 6 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, 1 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 406 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity:	526 litres	495 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible	1740 litres	no data
	Peugeot 406 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 406 has 31 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat.
Turning diameter:	11.5 meters	11 meters
	The turning circle of the Peugeot 406 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Passat, which means Peugeot 406 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight:	2`075 kg	2`010 kg

Safety:	no data
Quality:	no data	average
Average price (€):	800	1400
Pros and Cons:	Peugeot 406 has more full fuel tank mileage roomier boot lower price	Volkswagen Passat has more power more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Peugeot 406 2002 vs Volkswagen Passat 2000

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions