Peugeot 406 2002 vs Rover 75 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.7 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 117 HP | 120 HP | |
Torque: | 160 NM | 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
Peugeot 406 engine produces 3 HP less power than Rover 75, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Peugeot 406 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.8 | |
Peugeot 406 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 406 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
1120 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
Peugeot 406 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.74 m | 4.79 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.39 m | |
Peugeot 406 is smaller, but higher. Peugeot 406 is 5 cm shorter than the Rover 75, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 406 is 7 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 400 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1740 litres | 1222 litres | |
Peugeot 406 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Peugeot 406 has 125 litres more trunk space than the Rover 75. The Rover 75 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 406 (by 518 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Peugeot 406 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Rover 75. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`015 | 1`980 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 406 has
|
| |