Peugeot 406 1999 vs Mazda 626 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 194 HP | 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 267 NM | 218 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 406 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 406 engine produces 27 HP more power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 49 NM more than Mazda 626. Thanks to more power Peugeot 406 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 64 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.43 m | |
| Peugeot 406 is 15 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, width is practically the same , while the height of Peugeot 406 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 454 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage space. Peugeot 406 has 24 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 406 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 626, which means Peugeot 406 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 406 has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |