Peugeot 406 2000 vs Volvo S60 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 217 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 6.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 406 engine produces 90 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 113 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 406 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 406 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 406 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Peugeot 406 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 406 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 406 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.43 m | |
| Peugeot 406 is 2 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 406 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 424 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1034 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 406 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Peugeot 406 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`910 kg | 2`010 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`370 kg | 1`537 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 540 kg | 473 kg | |
| Peugeot 406 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem more than Volvo S60. Therefore, Peugeot 406 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 406 has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |