Peugeot 406 2000 vs Volvo S60 2002

 
Peugeot 406
2000 - 2002
Volvo S60
2002 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 136 HP130 HP
Torque: 314 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.2 seconds12 seconds
Peugeot 406 is more dynamic to drive.
Peugeot 406 engine produces 6 HP more power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 34 NM more than Volvo S60. Thanks to more power Peugeot 406 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.46.5
Peugeot 406 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Peugeot 406 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1090 km in combined cycle1070 km in combined cycle
1420 km on highway1370 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.60 m4.58 m
Width: 1.76 m1.80 m
Height: 1.41 m1.43 m
Peugeot 406 is 2 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 406 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
no data1034 litres
Turning diameter: 11.5 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Peugeot 406 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo S60, which means Peugeot 406 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`950 kg2`030 kg
Net weight:1`410 kg1`600 kg
Load capacity:540 kg430 kg
Peugeot 406 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem more than Volvo S60. Therefore, Peugeot 406 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 10001400
Pros and Cons: Peugeot 406 has
  • more dynamic
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv