Peugeot 406 2001 vs Mazda 626 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Peugeot 406 engine produces 28 HP more power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 22 NM more than Mazda 626. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.9 | |
|
The Peugeot 406 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 406 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that by driving the Peugeot 406 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 406 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Peugeot 406 is larger, but slightly lower. Peugeot 406 is 1 cm longer than the Mazda 626, 5 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 406 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 502 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Peugeot 406 has 72 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626. This could mean that the Peugeot 406 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 406 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 626, which means Peugeot 406 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | 1`685 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 406 has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |