Peugeot 406 1999 vs Mazda Xedos 9 2001
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 138 HP | 164 HP | |
Torque: | 190 NM | 212 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 11 seconds | |
Mazda Xedos 9 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 406 engine produces 26 HP less power than Mazda Xedos 9, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Mazda Xedos 9. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 406 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 10.7 | |
The Peugeot 406 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 406 consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Xedos 9, which means that by driving the Peugeot 406 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 68 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
1070 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
Peugeot 406 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.60 m | 4.88 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.40 m | |
Peugeot 406 is smaller, but slightly higher. Peugeot 406 is 28 cm shorter than the Mazda Xedos 9, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 406 is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 430 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Peugeot 406 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda Xedos 9. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`940 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 406 has
|
Mazda Xedos 9 has
| |