Peugeot 406 1999 vs Chrysler Sebring 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Peugeot 406) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Chrysler Sebring) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 188 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 406 engine produces 51 HP less power than Chrysler Sebring, but torque is 17 NM more than Chrysler Sebring. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 406 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 10.2 | |
|
The Peugeot 406 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 406 consumes 4.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring, which means that by driving the Peugeot 406 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 675 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 1550 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 406 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Peugeot 406 is smaller, but slightly higher. Peugeot 406 is 24 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 406 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 455 litres | |
|
Chrysler Sebring has more luggage space. Peugeot 406 has 25 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 406 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 406 has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |