Peugeot 406 1999 vs Volvo S40 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.6 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Volvo S40 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 406 engine produces 25 HP less power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 18 NM less than Volvo S40. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 406 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 8.6 | |
| Peugeot 406 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that by driving the Peugeot 406 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 406 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Peugeot 406 is larger. Peugeot 406 is 12 cm longer than the Volvo S40, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 471 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 853 litres | |
|
Volvo S40 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Peugeot 406 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 406 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo S40. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`720 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 406 has
|
Volvo S40 has
| |