Peugeot 406 1999 vs Mazda 626 1997

 
Peugeot 406
1999 - 2001
Mazda 626
1997 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 90 HP115 HP
Torque: 147 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.6 seconds9.9 seconds
Mazda 626 is a more dynamic driving.
Peugeot 406 engine produces 25 HP less power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 23 NM less than Mazda 626. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 406 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.47.9
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Peugeot 406 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 406 could require 75 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 830 km in combined cycle810 km in combined cycle
1090 km on highway1000 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.60 m4.58 m
Width: 1.76 m1.71 m
Height: 1.41 m1.43 m
Peugeot 406 is larger, but slightly lower.
Peugeot 406 is 2 cm longer than the Mazda 626, 5 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 406 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres502 litres
Mazda 626 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Peugeot 406 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Peugeot 406 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda 626, which means Peugeot 406 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: no data1`685 kg
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 1000800
Pros and Cons:
    Mazda 626 has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • roomier boot
    • better manoeuvrability
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv