Peugeot 406 1999 vs Mazda 626 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.6 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 406 engine produces 10 HP less power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Mazda 626. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 406 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.6 | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 406 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 406 could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Peugeot 406 is larger, but slightly lower. Peugeot 406 is 1 cm longer than the Mazda 626, 5 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 406 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 502 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Peugeot 406 has 72 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626. This could mean that the Peugeot 406 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 406 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda 626, which means Peugeot 406 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`685 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 626 has
| |