Peugeot 406 2003 vs Volvo S60 2003

 
Peugeot 406
2003 - 2004
Volvo S60
2003 - 2004
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.9 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 210 HP210 HP
Torque: 285 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.6 seconds7.4 seconds
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving.
Peugeot 406 and Volvo S60 have the same engine power, but Peugeot 406 torque is 35 NM less than Volvo S60. Peugeot 406 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.09.9
Peugeot 406 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 406 could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
930 km on highway940 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 4.60 m4.58 m
Width: 1.76 m1.80 m
Height: 1.41 m1.43 m
Peugeot 406 is 2 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 406 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1034 litres
Peugeot 406 has 6 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter: 11.5 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Peugeot 406 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Peugeot 406 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9952`030
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): no data1400
Pros and Cons:
    Volvo S60 has
    • more dynamic
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv