Peugeot 406 2002 vs Volvo S60 2003

 
Peugeot 406
2002 - 2004
Volvo S60
2003 - 2004
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 138 HP180 HP
Torque: 190 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.4 seconds9.5 seconds
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving.
Peugeot 406 engine produces 42 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 406 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.610.0
The Peugeot 406 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Peugeot 406 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Peugeot 406 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 810 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
1070 km on highway920 km on highway
Peugeot 406 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.60 m4.58 m
Width: 1.76 m1.80 m
Height: 1.41 m1.43 m
Peugeot 406 is 2 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 406 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1034 litres
Peugeot 406 has 6 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter: 11.5 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Peugeot 406 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo S60, which means Peugeot 406 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data2`030
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): no data1400
Pros and Cons: Peugeot 406 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv