Peugeot 406 2002 vs Volvo S60 2002
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 130 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 280 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 12 seconds | |
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 406 engine produces 20 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 406 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 7.6 | |
The Peugeot 406 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 406 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Peugeot 406 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
1370 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
Peugeot 406 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.60 m | 4.58 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.43 m | |
Peugeot 406 is 2 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 406 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 424 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1034 litres | |
Peugeot 406 has 6 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Peugeot 406 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo S60, which means Peugeot 406 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`050 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 406 has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |