Peugeot 406 2002 vs SAAB 9-3 2003

 
Peugeot 406
2002 - 2004
SAAB 9-3
2003 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.7 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 117 HP122 HP
Torque: 160 NM167 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.3 seconds11.5 seconds
Peugeot 406 engine produces 5 HP less power than SAAB 9-3, whereas torque is 7 NM less than SAAB 9-3. Despite less power, Peugeot 406 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.77.9
Real fuel consumption: 8.6 l/100km8.2 l/100km
The SAAB 9-3 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Peugeot 406 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that by driving the Peugeot 406 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Peugeot 406 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 900 km in combined cycle780 km in combined cycle
1160 km on highway1000 km on highway
810 km with real consumption750 km with real consumption
Peugeot 406 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.60 m4.64 m
Width: 1.76 m1.76 m
Height: 1.41 m1.47 m
Peugeot 406 is 4 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-3, width is practically the same , while the height of Peugeot 406 is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 430 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Peugeot 406 is 0.4 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-3.
Gross weight: no data1`400 kg
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 10001200
Pros and Cons: Peugeot 406 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv