Peugeot 406 2002 vs Mazda 6 2002
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.7 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 117 HP | 141 HP | |
Torque: | 160 NM | 181 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 406 engine produces 24 HP less power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 21 NM less than Mazda 6. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 406 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.5 | |
The Peugeot 406 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 406 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that by driving the Peugeot 406 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 64 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
1160 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
Peugeot 406 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Mazda 6 2002 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.60 m | 4.67 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.44 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 406 is 7 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 406 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 500 litres | |
Mazda 6 has more luggage space. Peugeot 406 has 70 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Peugeot 406 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 6. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`840 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 406 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |