Peugeot 406 2002 vs Mazda 6 2002

 
Peugeot 406
2002 - 2004
Mazda 6
2002 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.7 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 117 HP141 HP
Torque: 160 NM181 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.3 seconds9.7 seconds
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving.
Peugeot 406 engine produces 24 HP less power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 21 NM less than Mazda 6. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 406 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.78.5
The Peugeot 406 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Peugeot 406 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that by driving the Peugeot 406 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 900 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
1160 km on highway960 km on highway
Peugeot 406 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Mazda 6 2002 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages.

Dimensions

Length: 4.60 m4.67 m
Width: 1.76 m1.78 m
Height: 1.41 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 406 is 7 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 406 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres500 litres
Mazda 6 has more luggage space.
Peugeot 406 has 70 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Peugeot 406 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 6.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`840
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 1400800
Pros and Cons: Peugeot 406 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Mazda 6 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv