Peugeot 406 2002 vs Volvo XC70 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Peugeot 406 is available with front wheel drive, while Volvo XC70 can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.7 - 2.9 | 2.4 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 - 210 HP | 163 - 210 HP | |
Torque: | 160 - 314 NM | 285 - 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 - 13.4 seconds | 8 - 11.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 10.2 | 7.6 - 11.3 | |
Peugeot 406 petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC70. On average, Peugeot 406 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.74 m | 4.73 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.56 m | |
Peugeot 406 is 1 cm longer than the Volvo XC70, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 406 is 10 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1440 litres | 485 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1741 litres | 1641 litres | |
Peugeot 406 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 406 has 955 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC70. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 406 (by 100 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Peugeot 406 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC70. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`075 | ~ 2`220 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 406 has
|
Volvo XC70 has
| |