Peugeot 406 2002 vs Volvo XC70 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Peugeot 406
2002 - 2004
Volvo XC70
2000 - 2004
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Peugeot 406 is available with front wheel drive, while Volvo XC70 can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.7 - 2.92.4 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 90 - 210 HP163 - 210 HP
Torque: 160 - 314 NM285 - 340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.4 - 13.4 seconds8 - 11.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.7 - 10.27.6 - 11.3
Peugeot 406 petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC70. On average, Peugeot 406 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.74 m4.73 m
Width: 1.76 m1.86 m
Height: 1.46 m1.56 m
Peugeot 406 is 1 cm longer than the Volvo XC70, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 406 is 10 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 1440 litres485 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1741 litres1641 litres
Peugeot 406 has more luggage capacity.
Peugeot 406 has 955 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC70. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 406 (by 100 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.5 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Peugeot 406 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC70.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`075~ 2`220
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): no data2000
Pros and Cons: Peugeot 406 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Volvo XC70 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv