Peugeot 406 2002 vs Rover 75 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.7 - 2.9 | 1.8 - 4.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 210 HP | 116 - 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 - 314 NM | 160 - 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 - 13.4 seconds | 7.4 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 10.2 | 5.8 - 13.4 | |
|
Peugeot 406 petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Rover 75. On average, Peugeot 406 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Peugeot 406 is smaller, but higher. Peugeot 406 is 5 cm shorter than the Rover 75, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 406 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1440 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1741 litres | 1222 litres | |
|
Peugeot 406 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Peugeot 406 has 1040 litres more trunk space than the Rover 75. The Rover 75 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 406 (by 519 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 406 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Rover 75. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`075 | ~ 2`038 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 406 has
|
| |