Peugeot 406 1999 vs Mazda 626 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.7 - 2.9 | 1.8 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 210 HP | 100 - 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 - 314 NM | 152 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 14.7 seconds | 9.3 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 11.0 | 5.2 - 8.9 | |
|
Peugeot 406 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 626. On average, Peugeot 406 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.43 m | |
| Peugeot 406 and Mazda 626 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 502 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage space. Peugeot 406 has 72 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 406 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 626, which means Peugeot 406 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`933 | ~ 1`648 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 626 has
| |