Peugeot 406 1999 vs Mercedes C class 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Peugeot 406
1999 - 2002
Mercedes C class
2000 - 2004
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Peugeot 406 is available only with front wheel drive, while Mercedes C class can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.7 - 2.91.8 - 3.2

Performance

Power: 90 - 210 HP115 - 354 HP
Torque: 147 - 314 NM185 - 540 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8 - 14.7 seconds5.2 - 12.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.6 - 11.06.1 - 11.5
Peugeot 406 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes C class. On average, Peugeot 406 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.60 m4.53 m
Width: 1.76 m1.73 m
Height: 1.41 m1.43 m
Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 406 is 7 cm longer than the Mercedes C class, 3 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 406 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 430 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.5 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Peugeot 406 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mercedes C class, which means Peugeot 406 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`933~ 1`500
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 12001600
Pros and Cons: Peugeot 406 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Mercedes C klase has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv