Peugeot 406 2002 vs Mercedes C class 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Peugeot 406 is available only with front wheel drive, while Mercedes C class can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.7 - 2.9 | 1.8 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 - 210 HP | 115 - 354 HP | |
Torque: | 160 - 314 NM | 185 - 540 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 - 13 seconds | 5.2 - 12.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 10.0 | 6.1 - 11.5 | |
Peugeot 406 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes C class. On average, Peugeot 406 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.60 m | 4.53 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.43 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 406 is 7 cm longer than the Mercedes C class, 3 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 406 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Peugeot 406 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mercedes C class, which means Peugeot 406 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`921 | ~ 1`500 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 406 has
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |