Peugeot 4008 2012 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
| Peugeot 4008 engine produces 20 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 73 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Peugeot 4008 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 4008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 4008 consumes 4.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Peugeot 4008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 735 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 4008 consumes 4.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Peugeot 4008 is smaller. Peugeot 4008 is 5 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 4008 is 22 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 416 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1196 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 4008 has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |