Peugeot 4008 2012 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Peugeot 4008) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Renault Kadjar) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 197 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Renault Kadjar is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 4008 engine produces 20 HP more power than Renault Kadjar, but torque is 123 NM less than Renault Kadjar. Despite the higher power, Peugeot 4008 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 4.8 | |
|
The Renault Kadjar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 4008 consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 4008 could require 495 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| Renault Kadjar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi ASX | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Renault Kadjar engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Kadjar 2015 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Renault Kadjar 2015 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Peugeot 4008 is smaller, but slightly higher. Peugeot 4008 is 11 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 4008 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 416 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1196 litres | 1478 litres | |
|
Renault Kadjar has more luggage space. Peugeot 4008 has 56 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kadjar (by 282 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 4008 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 4008 has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |