Peugeot 4007 2007 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 232 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 4007 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 4007 engine produces 23 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 37 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Peugeot 4007 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 7.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 4007 consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 4007 could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Citroen C-Crosser | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi ASX, Peugeot 4008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 4007 is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, width is practically the same , while the height of Peugeot 4007 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space. Peugeot 4007 has 81 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 4007 is 1.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Peugeot 4007 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`410 | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 4007 has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |