Peugeot 4007 2007 vs Volvo XC60 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 285 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 4007 engine produces 129 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 4007 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 11.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 12.1 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 4007 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 4007 consumes 4.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Peugeot 4007 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 705 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 4007 consumes 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 4007 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 4007 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Citroen C-Crosser | Used also on Volvo S80 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 4007 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.71 m | |
| Peugeot 4007 is 1 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 4007 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Peugeot 4007 has 15 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 4007 (by 231 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 4007 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`410 | 2`440 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 4007 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |