Peugeot 4007 2007 vs Peugeot 3008 2009
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 156 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 380 NM | 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
Peugeot 4007 engine produces 6 HP more power than Peugeot 3008, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Peugeot 3008. Despite the higher power, Peugeot 4007 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 5.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
The Peugeot 3008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 4007 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 3008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 4007 could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 4007 consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 3008. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
1010 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
720 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
Peugeot 3008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 530'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 3008 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Citroen C-Crosser | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C4 Picasso, Citroen C4, Peugeot 5008 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 3008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.27 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.67 m | 1.64 m | |
Peugeot 4007 is 38 cm longer than the Peugeot 3008, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 4007 is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 432 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | 1241 litres | |
Peugeot 4007 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 4007 has 78 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 3008. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 4007 (by 445 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Peugeot 4007 is 1 metres more than that of the Peugeot 3008, which means Peugeot 4007 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`410 | 2`080 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 6600 | 5000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 4007 has
|
Peugeot 3008 has
| |