Peugeot 4007 2007 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
| Peugeot 4007 engine produces 21 HP less power than Mitsubishi Outlander, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 4007 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 4007 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 4007 could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 4007 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Citroen C-Crosser | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi L 200, Mitsubishi ASX | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 4007 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 4007 is 3 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, width is practically the same , while the height of Peugeot 4007 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 774 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | 1691 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space. Peugeot 4007 has 264 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 5 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 4007 is 1.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Peugeot 4007 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`410 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |