Peugeot 4007 2007 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Peugeot 4007) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mitsubishi Outlander) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 4007 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 4007 engine produces 4 HP less power than Mitsubishi Outlander, but torque is 167 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Despite less power, Peugeot 4007 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 4007 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 4007 consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Peugeot 4007 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 435 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 4007 consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 4007 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 22 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Citroen C-Crosser | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Grandis, Mitsubishi Eclipse | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 4007 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Peugeot 4007 is larger. Peugeot 4007 is 10 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 5 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 4007 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | 1691 litres | |
| Peugeot 4007 has 108 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 5 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 4007 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Peugeot 4007 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`410 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 4007 has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |