Peugeot 4007 2007 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 4007 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 4007 engine produces 6 HP more power than Chevrolet Captiva, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Chevrolet Captiva. Thanks to more power Peugeot 4007 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 4007 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 4007 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva, which means that by driving the Peugeot 4007 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 4007 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 530'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Captiva engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Citroen C-Crosser | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Antara, Chevrolet Epica, Chevrolet Cruze | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chevrolet Captiva might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.72 m | |
| Peugeot 4007 and Chevrolet Captiva are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 465 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 510 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | 930 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Peugeot 4007 has more luggage space (by 45 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 4007 (by 756 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 4007 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Captiva, which means Peugeot 4007 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`410 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 4007 has
|
Chevrolet Captiva has
| |