Peugeot 4007 2007 vs BMW X3 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
BMW X3 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 4007 engine produces 28 HP less power than BMW X3, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 4007 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 4007 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 4007 could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 4007 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 4007 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Citroen C-Crosser | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X1 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Peugeot 4007 is smaller, but slightly higher. Peugeot 4007 and BMW X3 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1686 litres | 1600 litres | |
| Peugeot 4007 has 40 litres less trunk space than the BMW X3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 4007 (by 86 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 4007 is 0.3 metres more than that of the BMW X3. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`410 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 4007 has
|
BMW X3 has
| |