Peugeot 308 2014 vs Skoda Rapid 2017

 
Peugeot 308
2014 - 2017
Skoda Rapid
2017 -
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 130 HP95 HP
Torque: 230 NM160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.1 seconds11 seconds
Peugeot 308 is more dynamic to drive.
Peugeot 308 engine produces 35 HP more power than Skoda Rapid, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Skoda Rapid. Thanks to more power Peugeot 308 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.94.5
The Skoda Rapid is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Peugeot 308 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 308 could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 53 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1080 km in combined cycle1220 km in combined cycle
1290 km on highway1370 km on highway
Skoda Rapid gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Peugeot 308 2014 1.2 engine: Since the timing belt is immersed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to excessive axial play in the ...  More about Peugeot 308 2014 1.2 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.25 m4.30 m
Width: 1.80 m1.71 m
Height: 1.46 m1.46 m
Peugeot 308 is 5 cm shorter than the Skoda Rapid, 10 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 420 litres415 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
855 litresno data
Peugeot 308 has 5 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Rapid.
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Peugeot 308 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Skoda Rapid, which means Peugeot 308 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7701`625
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

average
Skoda Rapid has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 308 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Skoda Rapid, so Skoda Rapid quality is probably better
Average price (€): 58007200
Pros and Cons: Peugeot 308 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Skoda Rapid has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv