Peugeot 308 2011 vs Renault Megane 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 308 engine produces 3 HP less power than Renault Megane, but torque is 30 NM more than Renault Megane. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 308 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Peugeot 308 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 308 could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Peugeot 308 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1330 km in combined cycle | 1460 km in combined cycle | |
| 1500 km on highway | 1710 km on highway | ||
| 1150 km with real consumption | 1130 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Citroen C3, Citroen C4 Picasso, Peugeot 2008, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 308 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Megane 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Megane 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.51 m | |
| Peugeot 308 is 7 cm shorter than the Renault Megane, 1 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 308 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 524 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2149 litres | 1595 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 308 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Renault Megane. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`100 kg | 1`857 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`430 kg | 1`320 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 670 kg | 537 kg | |
| Peugeot 308 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem more than Renault Megane. Therefore, Peugeot 308 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Peugeot 308 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Peugeot 308, so Peugeot 308 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 308 has
|
Renault Megane has
| |