Peugeot 308 2008 vs Renault Megane 2006

 
Peugeot 308
2008 - 2011
Renault Megane
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 175 HP110 HP
Torque: 240 NM151 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 seconds11.3 seconds
Peugeot 308 is more dynamic to drive.
Peugeot 308 engine produces 65 HP more power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 89 NM more than Renault Megane. Thanks to more power Peugeot 308 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.87.0
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Peugeot 308 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 308 could require 120 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle850 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway1050 km on highway
Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 280'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Renault Megane engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 11 years26 years
Engine spread: Used also on Peugeot 207Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Dacia Duster
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Peugeot 308 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Renault Megane 2006 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ...  More about Renault Megane 2006 1.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.50 m
Width: 1.82 m1.78 m
Height: 1.50 m1.46 m
Peugeot 308 and Renault Megane are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 508 litres520 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1736 litres1600 litres
Peugeot 308 has 12 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 308 (by 136 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Peugeot 308 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Renault Megane.
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1301`795
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

below average
Renault Megane has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 308 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Renault Megane, so Renault Megane quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 26001400
Pros and Cons: Peugeot 308 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • hydraulic power steering
Renault Megane has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • electric power steering
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv