Peugeot 308 2017 vs Skoda Rapid 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 308 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 308 engine produces 4 HP more power than Skoda Rapid, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Skoda Rapid. Thanks to more power Peugeot 308 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.9 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 308 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 308 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid, which means that by driving the Peugeot 308 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 308 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1650 km in combined cycle | 1340 km in combined cycle | |
| 1820 km on highway | 1410 km on highway | ||
| 1080 km with real consumption | 1070 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 308 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Peugeot 308 is 5 cm shorter than the Skoda Rapid, 10 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 415 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1228 litres | 1490 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 308 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Rapid, which means Peugeot 308 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`810 kg | 1`750 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`180 kg | 1`295 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 630 kg | 455 kg | |
| Peugeot 308 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 28 procentiem more than Skoda Rapid. Therefore, Peugeot 308 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Skoda Rapid has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 308 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Skoda Rapid, so Skoda Rapid quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 308 has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |