Peugeot 308 2017 vs Skoda Rapid 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 221 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
| Peugeot 308 engine produces 10 HP more power than Skoda Rapid, whereas torque is 21 NM more than Skoda Rapid. Despite the higher power, Peugeot 308 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 4.8 | |
|
The Skoda Rapid is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 308 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 308 could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Rapid gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Skoda Rapid 2017 1.4 engine: The engine is reliable, however, owners frequently report excessive oil consumption, which is usually linked to piston ring issues. Loss of power is another common complaint. It's advised against maintaining ... More about Skoda Rapid 2017 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Peugeot 308 is 5 cm shorter than the Skoda Rapid, 10 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 415 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1228 litres | no data | |
| Peugeot 308 has 5 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Rapid. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`780 | 1`691 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Skoda Rapid has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 308 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Skoda Rapid, so Skoda Rapid quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 308 has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |